Office by Alex Penny
My name is Bill, I am a recent graduate in Information Sciences and Technology from Penn State University and this is a place for me to post or give my 2 cents on the fascinating world of technology. I am now working for a pretty big technology related company whose name I will leave out just to avoid any possible complications, however far-fetched them happening may be. Music gets included from time to time as well.
It’s been bothering me how a case so ripe for parody wasn’t being noticed by them or The Daily Show.
Who owns smartphones? Have a look -
FJP: Props to that 11% of 65+ year olds.
Reposted from http://lat.ms/PizieT on August 24, 2012 at 08:40PM
The judge presiding over the infringement case between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. spotted two inconsistencies in the jury’s pro-Apple verdict and asked the nine-member jury to return to the deliberation room to reconsider the issues.
If something doesn’t seriously change between now and whatever result we get after the endless repeals process, we could be looking at a huge blow for innovation tonight. 3 days to deliberate a case so dense it deserved at least a week, ridiculous.
Admittedly I am fairly biased against Apple, but some of the patents they’re claiming are just ridiculous. What’s everyone else’s opinion of this case?
I don’t understand how this is any more infringement than any other android device. This better not result in the Galaxy S3 getting blocked or I’m going to be pissed.
